Best substack newsletters reddit how to#It does become problematic (and I wonder if Ben has noticed this) since most people are on their phone, where they won’t notice the multi-column, but rather a stream and the rest of the website underneath □ No idea how to “fix” that yet. I noticed it’s always better to have multi-column websites, where one column is a stream and the rest is data such as web presence or link to other blogs, etc. On the other hand, people seem to know how streams work. Personally I only do this when I’m “live” blogging an event (server setup, conference, etc). This approach is good for people who write multiple times a day. I wonder if there’s a way to do that in WordPress. From a reader’s PoV this makes total sense. The first “post” of the day is at top and the last one is at the end. Dave Winer’s blog, for example, groups content by year, month and day, but when you read the day, it’s not in reverse. However, over time I noticed that “combined” streams (I think it should have a better name, this is just me throwing an idea) are better. Re Streams: I think reverse chronological feeds are still a viable option for personal blogs. Greetings Om! I come here with two-in-one comments (well, technically a comment and a question). What do you think? Is reverse chronological “stream” still a valid design principle? or should we think differently? Leave a comment below, so I can learn from you. Yes, I have old faithful readers, but they too want to get the stuff emailed to them. These days, it is either newsletters or fly-by-visits that account for interaction on blogs. I felt that it was a way to showcase my whole “online being.” And that worked when people were in the habit of visiting blogs every day - even multiple times a day. The question is when will this flow down to individual websites, including blogs?Īs an old-school blogger, I have found a lot of comfort in the stream. Heavily visited large web publications such as The Verge, which found their start as “streams” are not using a non-stream-like user experience, and have found ways to combine the urgency of the stream with articles that need to stick around longer. As humans, our interests have become wide enough that we can at best peck at what’s flowing through. Social networks seem to have done a forensic analysis of content consumption behavior and have come to the conclusion that most of us can no longer follow the stream and make sense of what’s flowing through, or even catch what’s important. It is organized around what the machine thinks we need to see based on what we have seen in the past. It is more like a river that has been heavily dammed. Social networks are increasingly algorithmically organized, so their stream isn’t really a free-flowing stream. I often wonder, am I doing too much with this one place? Does the “stream” as an organizing principle even make sense in an information-dense and diverse world?Īcross the web, one can see “streams” losing their preeminence. In short, the diversity of information has increased. With the company’s shutdown in 2015, this website became a catch-all for everything, including technology-focused writing, interviews, and essays. Its primary function was to be a personal place - less about technology-focused writing and more about life and my obsessions. As years passed, the blog became a business, and I had to set up this website as a personal homestead. It was primarily technology-related blog posts - with an occasional personal blog post. What Ben is asking and I am echoing: are these end-days of using “stream” as a design and information organizing principle? It has been just over two decades that I have written “for” and published “to” the stream. If you look at my homepage with fresh eyes, my stream is a hodgepodge. It’s a genuine representation of what I’m reading and thinking about, and each post’s page looks fine to me, but it doesn’t quite hold together as a whole. As of right now, the homepage is a mix of long-form posts, short thoughts, and links I consider interesting, presented as a stream.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |